Login    Forum    Register    Search    FAQ

Board index » Strategy Table » Rules Questions




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:17 am 
Offline
Clan Ashigaru

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:09 am
Posts: 3
Came up during a game earlier:

Jahan specifically says "While Jahan is at the current battlefield, other players may not play Terrains"

The Golden Plains says "After engaging: You have Reconnaissance at the current battlefield. Creat a Terrain Strategy with the ability, etcetc"

Jahan says you can't play Terrains, but TGP creates a terrain. Does the Terrain still go through, as you're not playing it but creating it? Or does Jahan block it?

I suppose the question in it's simplest form is: Is creating a card the same as playing it?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:25 am 
Offline
Shoi

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Nottingham, UK
No, creating a card is not "playing" it.

However, putting it into play *is* playing it, and Jahan won't let you do that.

Note further, that the Good Faith Rule says:
If the action involves putting one or more cards into play as a non-optional effect, the player must be able to meet all costs and requirements to bring those cards into play legally, in order to meet the Good Faith rule.

Since putting the newly created Terrain into play is a non-optional effect of The Golden Plains' action (underlined below), and Jahan stops you playing Terrains, you may not announce The Golden Plains' action:
Recon Reaction: After engaging: You have Reconnaissance at the current battlefield. Create a Terrain Strategy with the ability, "Battle: If this card is in play, destroy it and target a Terrain in your hand: Take an additional Battle action to play it." Put it into play there.

Alex

_________________
L5R Rules Team


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:50 pm 
Offline
Clan Ashigaru

Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:09 am
Posts: 3
Thanks for the answer. That's what we thought but I figured I'd ask anyway.

As for the Battle ability of the terrain created, we figured that wouldn't work due to Jahan stopping playing terrains and the Battle ability saying specifically to play it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
Taisa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 854
Location: Chicago, IL
Ugh. I knew that Jahan would stop The Golden Plains from creating a Terrain, but I didn't realize he stops The Golden Plains from even taking the action to create the Terrain. That's harsh, because the Terrain is only half of the benefit of using The Golden Plains in a Scout-centered deck; you'd also gain Reconnaisance. Now, Reconaissance isn't required for the Lion Scouts to take their printed actions, but it is required for a few of the more powerful Strategies that could be played in that deck. :(

_________________
Image
Image
Image

Akodo_Kusamoto wrote:
I like your reasoning.


I am proud to be a Black Lion. One of many...

What am I playing now? [still in development]


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
Ji-samurai
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 55
Location: minnesota
So, to be clear, another player's 'restriction' card effect counts as 'a cost or requirement' that prevents an action from being announced?
How come Peace and other card search effects get a specific exception?
Limited: Search your Dynasty deck for a non-Unique Holding. Bring it into play (bowed), paying all costs.

Quote:
A player is not assumed to know the face-down contents of his or her decks, for purposes of the Good Faith Rule.
Example: An action’s effect tells the player to search his or her deck and bring a card from it into play. If there is no legal card to play left in the deck, the player still may take the action in good faith.

What if there is a legal card left to play but the player has no unbowed gold and no 0 cost holdings?

Quote:
The player may choose to have a search fail; he or she need not retrieve a suitable card even if found.
If an effect directs a player to search for a card and do something with it (such as play it or put it into the hand), and that thing fails, the card is discarded instead.

Wouldn't choosing to have the search fail make announcing peace violate the good faith rule, since it involves putting a card into play as a non-optional effect? Wouldn't failure to put the holding searched for by peace into play (due to inability to pay, other player's card effect (bad kharma a one koku), whatever) be a violation of good faith?

_________________
Straw Dog * The Dude Abides


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Golden Plains vs. Jahan
 Post Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:59 pm 
Offline
Shoi

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Nottingham, UK
Under discussion!

Alex

_________________
L5R Rules Team


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

Board index » Strategy Table » Rules Questions


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: